Hughes v. Dutson et al
| Douglas L Hughes |
| Stan McGee and Dusty Dutson |
| 5:2019cv00219 |
| July 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jerome T Kearney |
| D P Marshall |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (ljb) |
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT: Hughes's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/16/2019. (ljb) |
Filing 3
ORDER withdrawing the reference; and dismissing without prejudice Hughes' complaint. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/16/2019. (ljb)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER directing Plaintiff Hughes to submit either the $400 statutory filing fee or an In Forma Pauperis Motion, together with an amended complaint within 30 days of the entry of this Order; and directing the Clerk to send to Plaintiff an In Forma Pauperis Motion, together with the filing fee calculation sheet and a 1983 complaint form. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 7/3/2019. (kdr)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Douglas L Hughes.(kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
