Maxwell/G-Doffee v. Wooten et al
Don Merceleany R Maxwell/G-Doffee |
Melvin J Wooten, J Doe, Falicia A Bentley and Doe |
5:2019cv00225 |
July 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Brian S Miller |
J Thomas Ray |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Don Merceleany R Maxwell/G-Doffee. (llg) |
Filing 4 ORDER directing plaintiff to file an Amended Complaint that complies with the instructions in this Order within 30 days of the date of this Order; directing the Clerk to mail plaintiff a 1983 form labeled "Amended Complaint" #2 . Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 7/30/19. (tjb) |
Filing 3 INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONERS granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; directing plaintiff's custodian to collect monthly payments equal to 20% of the preceding month's income in your institutional account each time the amount in that account is greater than $10.00. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 7/24/19. (tjb) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Don Merceleany R Maxwell/G-Doffee. (llg) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Don Merceleany R Maxwell/G-Doffee. (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.