Culliford v. Jensen
| Tina Culliford |
| Michael Jenson and Michael Jensen |
| 5:2019cv00295 |
| September 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| D P Marshall |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Report due by 12/9/2019. Bench Trial set for 7/12/2021 at 9:30 AM in Little Rock Courtroom #1A before Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. Signed at the direction of the Court on 10/23/2019. (slb) |
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Complaint, #3 Answer. CORRECTION: The docket entries were modified to correct the spelling of the defendant's name as Mark Jensen as listed on the documents. (cmn) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to #2 Complaint by Michael Jensen.(kdr) (Docket text modified on 9/13/2019 to correct the party name.)(cmn) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Michael Jensen, filed by Tina Culliford.(kdr) (Docket text modified on 9/13/2019 to correct the party name.) (cmn) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Michael Jensen from Jefferson County Circuit Court, Case umber 35CV-19-427. Fee of $400 paid. Receipt Number LIT073881. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kdr) (Docket text modified on 9/13/2019 to correct party name.)(cmn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
