Rodgers et al v. Golden Pedic Inc et al
| Luanne Rodgers, Lavon Rodgers, Tristin Rodgers and Summer Rodgers |
| Golden Pedic Inc and Rony Diaz Ortiz |
| 5:2019cv00302 |
| September 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| James M Moody |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Golden Pedic Inc, Rony Diaz Ortiz (Carson, Staci) |
| Filing 5 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER:Rule 26(f) Conference to occur by 11/27/2019; Rule 26(f) Report due by 12/11/2019. Proposed Jury Trial set sometime during the week of 11/16/2020 at 9:15 AM in Little Rock Courtroom # 4A before Judge James M. Moody Jr. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 10/24/2019. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Final Scheduling Order)(kog) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service , filed by Tristin Rodgers. Golden Pedic Inc served on 9/11/2019. (Hartness, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by Golden Pedic Inc, Rony Diaz Ortiz. (ljb) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Luanne Rodgers, Lavon Rodgers, Tristin Rodgers, Summer Rodgers. (ljb) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Golden Pedic Inc, Rony Diaz Ortiz from Jefferson County Circuit Court, Case Number 35CV-19-440. Fee of $400 paid, Receipt #LIT073964. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ljb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
