Smith v. Giggleman et al
Plaintiff: Brad Paul Smith
Defendant: William Giggleman, Donald Compton and Ron Faupel
Case Number: 5:2019cv00315
Filed: October 1, 2019
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: James M Moody
Referring Judge: Joe J Volpe
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 22 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying Plaintiff's motion to compel #21 . After careful consideration of Plaintiff's motion, I find it should be denied. Plaintiff's motion indicates that Plaintiff has access to his medical records, but wishes to have his own copy of the medical records. ADC has policy against inmates possessing copies of their records and I find no basis to grant Plaintiff's motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 11/21/2019. (lej)
November 21, 2019 Filing 21 MOTION to Compel by Brad Paul Smith. (llg)
November 8, 2019 Filing 20 SUMMONS Returned Executed. William Giggleman served on 10/14/2019. (fjg)
November 8, 2019 Filing 19 Summons Returned Unexecuted on 10/14/2019 as to Ron Faupel. (fjg)
November 8, 2019 Filing 18 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Donald Compton served on 10/14/2019. (fjg)
November 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying as moot Plaintiff's motion for ruling pursuant to 13 #15 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 11/5/2019. (lej)
November 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 5/5/2020. Dispositive motions due by 6/5/2020. Dispositive motions on the issue of exhaustion due by 1/6/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 11/5/2019. (lej)
November 5, 2019 Filing 15 MOTION for Ruling by Brad Paul Smith. (llg)
November 5, 2019 Filing 14 NOTICE, CONSENT AND REFERENCE to a Magistrate Judge forwarded by the Clerk of Court. (lej)
November 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying Plaintiff's motion for a mental health evaluation #8 . Plaintiff seeks a court ordered mental health evaluation at the state hospital, UAMS, or some other non-ADC facility. Plaintiff's motion seeks a court order to immediately provide him the relief he seeks through this lawsuit. Accordingly, I find this motion will be resolved through the course of this litigation and is premature. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 11/4/2019. (lej)
November 1, 2019 Filing 12 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by Ron Faupel.(Garner, Jerry)
November 1, 2019 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Jerry D. Garner on behalf of Ron Faupel (Garner, Jerry)
November 1, 2019 Filing 10 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by Donald Compton.(Garner, Jerry)
November 1, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Jerry D. Garner on behalf of Donald Compton (Garner, Jerry)
October 30, 2019 Filing 8 MOTION for a Mental Health Evaluation by Brad Paul Smith. (kdr)
October 22, 2019 Filing 7 REPLY re #6 Answer to Complaint by Brad Paul Smith. (kdr)
October 14, 2019 Filing 6 ANSWER to #2 Complaint by William Giggleman.(Eubanks, Brent)
October 14, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Brent Jay Eubanks on behalf of William Giggleman (Eubanks, Brent)
October 8, 2019 Summons Issued as to All Defendants and forwarded to U.S. Marshal for service. (ljb)
October 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER that the Clerk prepare summons and the USM serve Defendants without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefore. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 10/7/2019. (lej)
October 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting Plaintiff's IFP Application #1 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 10/7/2019. (lej)
October 1, 2019 Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Brad Paul Smith. (ljb)
October 1, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Brad Paul Smith. (ljb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Giggleman et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Giggleman
Represented By: Brent Jay Eubanks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Donald Compton
Represented By: Jerry D. Garner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ron Faupel
Represented By: Jerry D. Garner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brad Paul Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?