Davis v. Correct Care Solutions et al
Alvin L Davis |
WellPath, Correct Care Solutions and Estella Murray Bland |
5:2019cv00347 |
November 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Patricia S Harris |
James M Moody |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER PLAINTIFFS granting #1 IFP motion; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's institutional account for the $350 filing fee; directing the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to the Warden of the Varner Unit, the ADC Trust Fund Centralization Bank Office, and the ADC Compliance Office; and directing the Clerk of the Court to prepare a summons for each defendant and the United States Marshal to serve a copy of #2 complaint, this order, and summons without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 11/12/2019. (ljb) |
Summons Issued as to All Defendants and forwarded to the U.S. Marshal for service. (ljb) |
Filing 3 REQUEST for Production of Documents by Alvin L Davis. (ljb) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Alvin L Davis. (ljb) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Alvin L Davis. (ljb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.