Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Chemtura Corporation
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
Chemtura Corporation |
Cecil Nicholas Delphin and Robert Bennett |
R. L. Johnson & Son, Inc. and Chemtura Corporation |
1:2007cv01025 |
March 29, 2007 |
US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
Union |
Harry F. Barnes |
Both |
U.S. Government Plaintiff |
28:451 Employment Discrimination |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 75 ORDER granting 53 Motion for Summary Judgment; plaintiffs claims dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Harry F. Barnes on July 6, 2009. (cnn) |
Filing 72 ORDER REOPENING CASE as to EEOC; individual claims of intervenors not reopened at this time re: automatic stay under Bankruptcy. Signed by Honorable Harry F. Barnes on March 26, 2009. (cnn) |
Filing 71 ORDER re 70 Suggestion of Bankruptcy filed by Chemtura Corporation; case adminstratively terminated. Signed by Honorable Harry F. Barnes on March 25, 2009. (cnn) |
Filing 50 ORDER approving 46 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Chemtura Corporation; dismisses with prejudice the causes of action contained in Count IV of the Complaint in Intervention on Behalf of Cecil Nicholas Delphin and Robert Bennett (Doc. 7) and Count IV of the Complaint in Intervention on Behalf of Murphy Chambliss and Victor Moody (Doc. 18). Signed by Honorable Harry F. Barnes on January 8, 2009. (cnn) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.