Potter v. Langley

Plaintiff: Kevin Potter
Defendant: Jerry Langley
Case Number: 1:2011cv01067
Filed: November 2, 2011
Court: Arkansas Western District Court
Office: El Dorado Office
County: U.S., Outside State
Presiding Judge: Susan O. Hickey
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 1, 2012 22 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT/ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 19 ; Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on May 1, 2012. (cnn)
March 27, 2012 18 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT for 17 Report and Recommendations; 13 Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by BH & M Oil & Gas Field Services. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on March 26, 2012. (cnn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Potter v. Langley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin Potter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jerry Langley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?