Lawson v. Camden, AR, City of et al
| Sylvia Lawson |
| David Norwood, James Singleton, Camden, AR, City of, John Parker, William O'Keefe and John Does |
| 1:2012cv01092 |
| August 15, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| El Dorado Office |
| Ouachita |
| Susan O. Hickey |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER granting 30 Motion for Summary Judgment as to plaintiffs section 1983 claims against Officer Parker, Chief OKeefe, and the City, these claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE ; as to the state law claims, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction, and these claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on October 3, 2013. (cnn)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER granting 38 Motion to Dismiss separate defendant David Norwood, claims dismissed without prejudice; denying as moot 28 Motion for Summary Judgment of separate defendant, David Norwood. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on September 10, 2013. (cnn)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER granting 22 Motion to Dismiss Separate Defendant, James Singleton, (Individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Hempstead County, AR); James Singleton dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on February 19, 2013. (cnn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
