Campbell v. Clyde et al
| Boyd Brinlee Campbell |
| Andrew Clyde and Roger Jenkins |
| 1:2020cv01010 |
| April 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Timothy L Brooks |
| Susan O Hickey |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Docket Annotation of Mailing: A copy of the Initial Scheduling Order was mailed to Pro Se Plaintiff, Boyd Brinlee Campbell on 5/21/20. (slc) |
| Filing 14 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Hearing set for 8/17/2020 10:30 AM in Fayetteville -- 5th flr (Rm 509) before Honorable Timothy L. Brooks. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 7/9/2020. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on May 21, 2020. (slc) |
| Filing 13 MEMORANDUM BRIEF in Support of #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Andrew Clyde, Roger Jenkins. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Affidavit of Roger Jenkins)(Shepherd, Matthew) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Andrew Clyde, Roger Jenkins. (Shepherd, Matthew) |
| Filing 11 USM285 FORM/ SUMMONS Returned Executed by Boyd Brinlee Campbell. Andrew Clyde and Roger Jenkins served on 4/30/2020, answer due 5/21/2020. (cnn) |
| Filing 10 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS AND CASE PARTICIPANTS. Summons Issued as to Andrew Clyde, Roger Jenkins and USM285 forms delivered to USMS for each defendant for whom summons was issued with the following documents attached: re #1 Complaint, #3 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form, #9 Order Directing Service. (mll) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Reconsideration re #6 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, Order on Motion for Service; ORDER DIRECTING THE MARSHALS SERVICE TO SERVE Andrew Clyde, Roger Jenkins and granting 21 days to answer. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on April 23, 2020. (cc: U.S. Marshals Service)(mll)
|
| Filing 8 TEXT ONLY ORDER REFERRING MOTION: #7 MOTION for Reconsideration re #6 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis,, Order on Motion for Service, filed by Boyd Brinlee Campbell to Honorable Barry A. Bryant. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on April 23, 2020. Motions referred to Barry A. Bryant.(ee) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Reconsideration re #6 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, Order on Motion for Service by Boyd Brinlee Campbell. (mll) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying #2 Motion for Service. Plaintiff is directed to pay the filing fee within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order or this case is subject to dismissal. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on April 14, 2020 (mll)
|
| Filing 5 TEXT ONLY MEMO OF REASSIGNMENT. Case reassigned to Honorable Timothy L. Brooks. Honorable Susan O. Hickey no longer assigned (recusal) to the case. (cnn) |
| Filing 4 MOTIONS REFERRED to Honorable Barry A. Bryant: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis MOTION for Service filed by Boyd Brinlee Campbell. Motions referred to Honorable Barry A. Bryant.(cnn) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form (cnn) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, MOTION for Service by Boyd Brinlee Campbell. (cnn) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Boyd Brinlee Campbell.(cnn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
