Pena v. Mission Creek Resources, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Mario Pena
Defendant: Bear Creek Engineering, LLC, Mission Creek Resources, LLC, Mission Creek Opco, LLC, James E. Strain, Jr., Mission Creek Employee Co., LLC and Mission Creek Investment Holdings, LLC
Case Number: 1:2020cv01069
Filed: December 30, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Susan O Hickey
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER finding as moot #15 Motion to Remand; granting #17 Unopposed Motion to Remand to State Court. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on February 25, 2021. (cnn)
February 16, 2021 Filing 17 Unopposed MOTION to Remand by Mission Creek Employee Co., LLC, Mission Creek Investment Holdings, LLC, Mission Creek Opco, LLC, Mission Creek Resources, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Order)(Dodson, Robert)
January 29, 2021 Filing 16 MEMORANDUM BRIEF in Support of #15 MOTION to Remand PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND by Mario Pena. (Doan, Darby)
January 29, 2021 Filing 15 MOTION to Remand PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND by Mario Pena. (Doan, Darby)
January 22, 2021 Filing 14 ANSWER to #4 Complaint with Jury Demand by Bear Creek Engineering, LLC, James E. Strain, Jr.(Vanderford, Michael)
January 15, 2021 Filing 13 NOTICE by Bear Creek Engineering, LLC, James E. Strain, Jr Consent to Removal (Vanderford, Michael)
January 15, 2021 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael P. Vanderford on behalf of Bear Creek Engineering, LLC, James E. Strain, Jr. (Vanderford, Michael)
January 8, 2021 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard Nash Dodson on behalf of Mission Creek Employee Co., LLC, Mission Creek Investment Holdings, LLC, Mission Creek Opco, LLC, Mission Creek Resources, LLC. (Dodson, Richard)
January 7, 2021 TEXT ONLY CLERK'S NOTICE re Multiple Attorneys Listed on Pleading directed to Defendants Mission Creek Employee Co., LLC, Mission Creek Investment Holdings, LLC, Mission Creek Opco, LLC, Mission Creek Resources, LLC. Answer to Complaint #10 lists multiple attorneys appearing for the filer. The following attorney(s), who did not sign the pleading, must enter a separate Notice of Appearance in order to receive electronic notification of future activity in the case: Richard Dodson. (cnn)
January 6, 2021 Filing 10 ANSWER to #4 Complaint with Jury Demand by Mission Creek Employee Co., LLC, Mission Creek Investment Holdings, LLC, Mission Creek Opco, LLC, Mission Creek Resources, LLC.(Dodson, Robert)
January 4, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Cannedy Dalby on behalf of Mario Pena. (Dalby, Robert)
January 4, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Kyle Randall Akin on behalf of Mario Pena. (Akin, Kyle)
January 4, 2021 Filing 7 ***PLEASE DISREGARD. FILED IN ERROR.*** NOTICE of Appearance by Darby Vincent Doan on behalf of Mario Pena. (Doan, Darby) Modified on 1/4/2021. (mll)
January 4, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Darby Vincent Doan on behalf of Mario Pena. (Doan, Darby)
December 30, 2020 Filing 5 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form (cnn)
December 30, 2020 Filing 4 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Mario Pena. (originally filed in state court)(cnn)
December 30, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE by Mission Creek Employee Co., LLC, Mission Creek Investment Holdings, LLC, Mission Creek Opco, LLC, Mission Creek Resources, LLC of mailing re Notice of Removal to Columbia County Circuit Clerk (cnn)
December 30, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Columbia County Circuit Court, case number CV-20-217-6., filed by Mission Creek Opco, LLC, Mission Creek Investment Holdings, LLC, Mission Creek Resources, LLC, Mission Creek Employee Co., LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(cnn)
December 30, 2020 Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET for case initiated by Mission Creek Employee Co., LLC, Mission Creek Investment Holdings, LLC, Mission Creek Opco, LLC, Mission Creek Resources, LLC. (cnn)
December 30, 2020 Notice of Removal filing fee paid re #2 Notice of Removal, Clerk's Notice Regarding Filing Fee,, : $ 402, receipt number AARWDC-2302696.. (Dodson, Robert)
December 30, 2020 CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING FILING FEE. The following document was received and filed without the appropriate filing fee: #2 Notice of Removal,. You MUST pay the filing fee of $ 402.00 or file a motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis, if appropriate, within 2 business days.If the proper fees or motion are not received for case initiating documents, your case may be subject to dismissal.Present your payment to the appropriate Divisional Office or Pay Online, using the Civil -> Other Documents -> Filing Fee Submitted event. Filing Fee due by 1/4/2021 (cnn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pena v. Mission Creek Resources, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bear Creek Engineering, LLC
Represented By: Michael P. Vanderford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mission Creek Resources, LLC
Represented By: Robert Edwin Dodson
Represented By: Richard Nash Dodson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mission Creek Opco, LLC
Represented By: Robert Edwin Dodson
Represented By: Richard Nash Dodson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James E. Strain, Jr.
Represented By: Michael P. Vanderford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mission Creek Employee Co., LLC
Represented By: Robert Edwin Dodson
Represented By: Richard Nash Dodson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mission Creek Investment Holdings, LLC
Represented By: Robert Edwin Dodson
Represented By: Richard Nash Dodson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mario Pena
Represented By: Greg Burton
Represented By: G. Randy Akin
Represented By: Kyle Randall Akin
Represented By: Darby Vincent Doan
Represented By: Robert Cannedy Dalby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?