Jurls v. Manhattan Life Assurance Company of America
Plaintiff: Danny Jurls
Defendant: Manhattan Life Assurance Company of America
Case Number: 1:2023cv01069
Filed: June 30, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Susan O Hickey
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 20, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Colt D. Galloway on behalf of Manhattan Life Assurance Company of America. (Galloway, Colt)
June 30, 2023 Filing 4 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form.(mll)
June 30, 2023 Filing 3 STATE COURT COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Manhattan Life Assurance Company of America filed by Danny Jurls.(mll)
June 30, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Manhattan Life Assurance Company of America.(mll)
June 30, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Ouachita County Circuit Court, case number 52CV-23-88 filed by Manhattan Life Assurance Company of America. (Attachments: #1 Ex. A, #2 Ex. B, #3 Ex. C)(mll)
June 30, 2023 Notice of Removal filing fee paid re Clerk's Notice Regarding Filing Fee,, : $ 402, receipt number AARWDC-2798471.. (Miller, Stuart)
June 30, 2023 CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING FILING FEE. The following document was received and filed without the appropriate filing fee: #1 Notice of Removal. You MUST pay the filing fee of $402.00 or file a motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis, if appropriate, within 2 business days.If the proper fees or motion are not received for case initiating documents, your case may be subject to dismissal.Present your payment to the appropriate Divisional Office or Pay Online, using the Civil -> Other Documents -> Filing Fee Submitted event. Filing Fee due by 7/3/2023.(mll)
June 30, 2023 TEXT ONLY CLERK'S NOTICE re Multiple Attorneys Listed on Pleading directed to Plaintiff Danny Jurls. Complaint #3 lists multiple attorneys appearing for the filer. The following attorneys, who did not sign the pleading, must enter a separate Notice of Appearance in order to receive electronic notification of future activity in the case: Darla Crawford, Brandon Cogburn.(mll)
June 30, 2023 TEXT ONLY CLERK'S NOTICE re Multiple Attorneys Listed on Pleading directed to Defendant Manhattan Life Assurance Company of America. Notice of Removal #1 lists multiple attorneys appearing for the filer. The following attorney, who did not sign the pleading, must enter a separate Notice of Appearance in order to receive electronic notification of future activity in the case: Colt D. Galloway.(mll)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jurls v. Manhattan Life Assurance Company of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danny Jurls
Represented By: Bruce A. Flint
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Manhattan Life Assurance Company of America
Represented By: Stuart P. Miller
Represented By: Colt D. Galloway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?