Hardy v. Mitcham et al
| Raymond Douglas Hardy |
| Captain Lisa Worley and Captain Richard Mitcham |
| 1:2024cv01052 |
| August 14, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Barry A Bryant |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF DIRECT ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE. This case has been assigned to a U.S. Magistrate Judge to conduct all proceedings and for entry of a final judgment. You must file the attached form memorializing consent or requesting reassignment to a District Judge within (21) days. Consent or Reassignment form due by 9/4/2024. (jlm) |
Filing 3
ORDER that the matter has been provisionally filed as the undersigned finds that additional information is needed to rule on Plaintiff's IFP application. Specifically the Court requires the following information: complete certificate. Failure to comply within the time period specified could result in summary dismissal for failure to obey a court order. Completed IFP due by 9/4/2024. Signed by Honorable Barry A Bryant on August 14, 2024. (jlm)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983), MOTION for Service by Raymond Douglas Hardy. (jlm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (42:1983) against Richard Mitcham, Lisa Worley, filed by Raymond Douglas Hardy.(jlm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
