Parkhurst et al v. Tabor et al
Ross Parkhurst, Amy Parkhurst and H.P. |
Stephen Tabor, Daniel Shue, Sebastian, County of and Chad Belt |
Chad Belt |
H.P., Ross Parkhurst and Amy Parkhurst |
2:2007cv02068 |
June 27, 2007 |
US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
Fort Smith Office |
Clark |
Robert T. Dawson |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 175 ORDER re 167 Bill of Costs filed by Ross Parkhurst, H.P., and Amy Parkhurst. The Court finds that Defendant Chad Belt should reimburse Plaintiffs for one-half of such costs or $1206.86. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on August 24, 2009. (lw) |
Filing 171 ORDER re 168 MOTION to Review Tax Returns In Camera filed by Patricia Hackler, Lee Hackler. That there is no reason to alter the order previously entered and the Respondents are to produce the tax returns in question to Plaintiffs no later than 7/28/09. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on June 30, 2009. (lw) |
Filing 166 ORDER denying 154 Motion to Set Aside Order.and Quash; affirming 153 Magistrate's Order; and granting 157 Motion for Order to Declare Payover Subordinate to Child Support Obligations as set forth. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on June 1, 2009. (lw) |
Filing 123 ORDER re 114 Motion for Default Judgment denied as moot; and granting 118 Motion to Enter Agreed Payover Order. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on December 29, 2008. (lw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.