Helm v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
| Michael D. Helm |
| Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada |
| 2:2007cv02112 |
| October 9, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Fort Smith Office |
| Sebastian |
| Jimm Larry Hendren |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER granting defendant's 34 Motion for Release of Bond Obligation and the Supersedeas Bond posted by Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada is released; further ordered that the original Letter of Credit posted by defendant Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada be returned to it, c/o Paul D. Waddell, Barrett & Deacon, P.A., P.O. Box 1506, Fayetteville, AR 72702. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on June 16, 2009. (rw)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER granting 25 Motion to Stay. The defendant has five days from the date of this order to submit the referenced letter of credit to the Court. The Clerk is directed to accept the letter of credit as a supersedeas bond under Rule 62(d) of the Fe deral Rules of Civil Procedures. All attempts to execute upon the judgment are stayed until such time as the appeal of this matter is decided. The defendant shall be required to renew the letter of credit if it expires before the appeal is decided. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on March 30, 2009. (lw)(letter of credit received 4/1/09) Modified on 4/1/2009 to add text (lw).
|
|
Filing
23
JUDGMENT as set forth. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on March 2, 2009. (rw)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER: that the decision of Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada to terminate ERISA benefits to Michael D. Helm under the Sparks Health System employee welfare benefit plan is reversed. That Michael D. Helm is entitled to judgment against Sun Life A ssurance Company of Canada in the sum of $240,000.00 for past benefits accrued but unpaid as of the date of this Order, for which judgment will be entered when issues of pre-judgment interest, attorney's fees, and costs have been resolved. That Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada reinstate benefits payments to Michael D. Helm, and continue paying same for as long as he remains eligible. Further, that any petition for pre-judgment interest, attorney's fees, and costs be filed within fourteen days of the date of this Order, and that any objection thereto be filed within eleven days thereafter. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on November 24, 2008. (lw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Helm v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael D. Helm | |
| Represented By: | Stephanie Harper Easterling |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
