Adams v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
| 2:2007cv02133 |
| November 28, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Fort Smith Office |
| Robert T. Dawson |
| James R. Marschewski |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
ORDER granting 15 Motion for Attorney Fees and awarding the amount of $2401.11. This amount shall be paid in addition to, and not out of, any past-due benefits plaintiff may be awarded in the future and adopting Report and Recommendations re 18 . Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on February 17, 2011. (sh) Modified on 2/17/2011 to edit text (sh).
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 9 , and REMANDS case to the Commissioner for further consideration pursuant to sentence six of 42 USC 405(g). Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on October 16, 2008. (sh)
|
|
Filing
9
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 3 Complaint filed by Richard F. Adams. Objections to R&R due by 10/14/2008. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on September 26, 2008. (sh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Adams v. Social Security Administration Commissioner | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
