Garris v. Crawford County Sheriff's Department et al
| Melvin Paul Garris |
| Crawford County Sheriff's Department, Ken Bell and Doe |
| 2:2008cv02045 |
| May 16, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| U.S., Outside State |
| Jimm Larry Hendren |
| James R. Marschewski |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER granting 38 Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment, and adopting Report and Recommendations in its entirety re 47 . ***Civil Case Dismissed with Prejudice and Terminated. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on September 20, 2010. (sh)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER directing defendants to file motion for summary judgment on or before 11/10/09. The plaintiff is directed not to respond to the motion for summary judgment until so ordered by the court. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on August 6, 2009. (lw)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER denying as moot 21 Motion to Dismiss; Christopher Waters terminated; and DIRECTING SERVICE on Mike Allen and granting 20 days to answer. Sheriff Allen is directed to identify for the court the officers involved in the seizure of the vehicle from the plaintiff on or about 11/22/05. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on March 17, 2009. (lw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
