Singleton v. Fireman's Fund

Plaintiff: Carl Singleton
Defendant: Fireman's Fund
Case Number: 2:2008cv02046
Filed: May 19, 2008
Court: Arkansas Western District Court
Office: Insurance Office
County: Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Robert T. Dawson
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 7, 2008 20 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that Plaintiff's case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE on the grounds that Plaintiff has failed to prosecute it and has failed to comply with Court Orders. Further the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint 16 is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on October 7, 2008. (lw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Singleton v. Fireman's Fund
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carl Singleton
Represented By: Craig L Cook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fireman's Fund
Represented By: Paul D. McNeill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?