Mullen v. Taylor

Plaintiff: Thurstle Dale Mullen
Defendant: James Michael Taylor
Case Number: 2:2010cv02019
Filed: February 11, 2010
Court: Arkansas Western District Court
Office: Fort Smith Office
County: Sebastian
Presiding Judge: Robert T. Dawson
Referring Judge:
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 9, 2011 33 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 31 Motion for Reconsideration filed by James Michael Taylor. Signed by Honorable Paul K. Holmes, III on June 9, 2011. (sh)
April 18, 2011 30 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER; denying 23 Motion to Dismiss Case and granting 27 Motion to Dismiss. CASE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, as set forth. Signed by Honorable Paul K. Holmes, III on April 18, 2011. (lw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mullen v. Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thurstle Dale Mullen
Represented By: Danny R. Crabtree, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Michael Taylor
Represented By: Philip Bagby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?