J. Russell Flowers, Inc. et al v. US Technology Marine Services, LLC et al
| J. Russell Flowers, Inc. and MKJ, Inc. |
| Raymond L. Williams Trust and US Technology Marine Services, LLC |
| US Technology Marine Services, LLC and Raymond L. Williams Trust |
| J. Russell Flowers, Inc. and MKJ, Inc. |
| 2:2011cv02017 |
| January 21, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Fort Smith Office |
| U.S., Outside State |
| Paul K. Holmes |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
ORDER denying 53 defendant's Motion in Limine, denying 54 plaintiffs Motion in Limine re Plaintiffs attorney serving as a witness at trial, and denying 55 plainatiffs Motion in Limine to present certain proof of damages at trial in support of their Counterclaim, and denying 56 plaintiffs Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on May 14, 2012. (sh)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER denying request for cancellation of settlement conference re: 44 Order Setting/Resetting Hearings, as set forth. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on January 30, 2012. (lw)
|
|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 15 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, filed by US Technology Marine Services, LLC as set forth. This case is set for jury trial commencing March 19, 2012. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on January 6, 2012. (mfr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
