United States of America v. Hunter

Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Jane E. Hunter
Case Number: 2:2011cv02074
Filed: April 29, 2011
Court: Arkansas Western District Court
Office: Fort Smith Office
County: Logan
Presiding Judge: Robert T. Dawson
Nature of Suit: Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment
Cause of Action: 28:1345
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 18, 2011 4 Opinion or Order of the Court CONSENT JUDGMENT in favor of United States of America against Jane E. Hunter in the amount of $22581.00 with court costs in the amount of $370.00 and interest at the rate of.18% per annum until paid. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on May 18, 2011. (sh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Hunter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: David R. Ferguson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane E. Hunter
Represented By: Michael Hamby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?