Essman v. Social Security Administration Commissioner

Justia Dockets & Filings Eighth Circuit Arkansas Western District Essman v. Social Security Administration Commissioner

Essman v. Social Security Administration Commissioner

Plaintiff:	Cynthia Lou Essman
Defendant:	Social Security Administration Commissioner
Case Number:	2:2011cv02079
Filed:	May 5, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
Office:	Fort Smith Office
County:	Sebastian
Presiding Judge:	Barry A. Bryant
Presiding Judge:	Robert T. Dawson
Nature of Suit:	Disability Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 21, 2012	Filing 17 JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees in favor of Cynthia Lou Essman in the amount of $4834.20. This amount should be paid in addition to, and not out of, any past due benefits which plaintiff may be awarded in the future. Further, any EAJA award by this Court should be made payable to plaintiff and not counsel. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on August 21, 2012. (sh)
May 25, 2011	Filing 4 ORDER granting 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.; granting 3 Motion for Service and DIRECTING SERVICE on Social Security Administration ORDER granting plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The court directs that the plaintiff is to serve a copy of the complaint and this order on the defendant by certified mail, return receipt requested, as well as the US Attorney General and US Attorney for Western District/Arkansas without prepayment of fees and costs. Defendant is to answer within 60 days from the date of service. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on May 25, 2011. (sh)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 21, 2012

Filing 17 JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees in favor of Cynthia Lou Essman in the amount of $4834.20. This amount should be paid in addition to, and not out of, any past due benefits which plaintiff may be awarded in the future. Further, any EAJA award by this Court should be made payable to plaintiff and not counsel. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on August 21, 2012. (sh)

May 25, 2011

Filing 4 ORDER granting 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.; granting 3 Motion for Service and DIRECTING SERVICE on Social Security Administration ORDER granting plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The court directs that the plaintiff is to serve a copy of the complaint and this order on the defendant by certified mail, return receipt requested, as well as the US Attorney General and US Attorney for Western District/Arkansas without prepayment of fees and costs. Defendant is to answer within 60 days from the date of service. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on May 25, 2011. (sh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Essman v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration Commissioner
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cynthia Lou Essman
Represented By:	Davis Duty
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?