Hughes v. Selig

Plaintiff: David Wayne Hughes
Defendant: John M. Selig
Case Number: 2:2011cv02083
Filed: May 6, 2011
Court: Arkansas Western District Court
Office: Fort Smith Office
County: Sebastian
Presiding Judge: Paul K. Holmes
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 26, 2011 18 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 17 Motion to Dismiss Case. Further Plaintiff's cause of action is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on August 26, 2011. (lw)
June 6, 2011 11 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 10 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, until June 13, 2011. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on June 6, 2011. (sh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hughes v. Selig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Wayne Hughes
Represented By: James William Robb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John M. Selig
Represented By: Richard N. Rosen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?