Arrington et al v. MGC Mortgage, Inc.
Steve Arrington and Shanna Arrington |
MGC Mortgage, Inc. |
2:2011cv02089 |
May 16, 2011 |
US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
Fort Smith Office |
Crawford |
Paul K. Holmes |
Negotiable Instrument |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER granting defendant's 14 Motion to Dismiss and plaintiffs' case is dismissed without prejudice on the grounds that they failed to prosecute it and have failed to comply with an Order of the Court; further the Court Clerk is directed to ensure plaintiffs' former counsel, Jerod Medlock receives a copy of this order; further Mr. Medlock is directed to provide a copy of this order to plaintiffs at their last known address. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on December 7, 2011. (rw) |
Filing 13 ORDER granting 12 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney filed by Morgan S. Doughty and M. Jered Medlock and Attorneys Morgan S. Doughty and M. Jered Medlock are terminated as directed. Plaintiffs are ordered to have another attorney enter an appearance f or them or advise the court they wish to proceed Pro Se by September 26, 2011. It is further ordered that Doc. 11 originally filed by Mr. Medlock should be terminated as moot. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on August 30, 2011. (sh) Modified on 8/30/2011 to edit text (rw). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.