White v. Whirlpool Corporation

Plaintiff: Tim White
Defendant: Whirlpool Corporation
Case Number: 2:2011cv02109
Filed: June 9, 2011
Court: Arkansas Western District Court
Office: Fort Smith Office
County: Sebastian
Presiding Judge: Paul K. Holmes
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42:12117
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 6, 2011 5 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN ITS ENTIRETY. Further Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff is instructed that he may refile his ERISA claim, if any, if he desires to do so after he has exhausted all remedies under the plan. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on September 6, 2011. (lw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: White v. Whirlpool Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tim White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Whirlpool Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?