Reed v. Malone's Mechanical, Inc. et al
| Michael Reed |
| Malone's Mechanical, Inc. and Michael Jacobs |
| Malone's Mechanical, Inc. and Michael Jacobs |
| Gilbert Project Services, Inc. |
| 2:2011cv02135 |
| July 22, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Fort Smith Office |
| Sebastian |
| P. K. Holmes |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
JUDGMENT that Plaintiff takes nothing on his Complaint and the matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All parties are to bear their respective costs and attorneys' fees. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on August 24, 2012. (lw)
|
|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 34 Motion for Extension of Time to File, denying as moot 35 Motion to Amend/Correct, denying 36 Motion for Reconsideration and further denying 37 Motion for Reconsideration, filed by Malone's Mechanical, Inc. and Michael Jacobs. This case remains set for jury trial beginning 8/20/12. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on July 30, 2012. (lw)
|
|
Filing
15
OPINION AND ORDER denying 9 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Gilbert Project Services, Inc. Further Gilbert's 8 Motion to Dismiss, to the extent that it remains a pending motion, is denied as moot. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on February 22, 2012. (lw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
