Chester Arch Realty, LLC v. K Mart Corporation

Plaintiff: Chester Arch Realty, LLC
Defendant: K Mart Corporation
Case Number: 2:2011cv02212
Filed: November 7, 2011
Court: Arkansas Western District Court
Office: Fort Smith Office
County: Sebastian
Presiding Judge: P. K. Holmes
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 12, 2012 23 Opinion or Order of the Court AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on September 12, 2012. (lw)
May 22, 2012 19 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 18 Motion for Leave, further denying as moot 15 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on May 22, 2012. (lw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chester Arch Realty, LLC v. K Mart Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: K Mart Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chester Arch Realty, LLC
Represented By: Michael T. Cappel
Represented By: Vince Chadick
Represented By: Daniel E. Izenson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?