Shaw v. Allied Interstate

Plaintiff: Dawn Shaw
Defendant: Allied Interstate
Case Number: 2:2012cv02040
Filed: February 24, 2012
Court: Arkansas Western District Court
Office: Fort Smith Office
County: Sebastian
Presiding Judge: P. K. Holmes
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 19, 2012 30 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part plaintiff's 23 Motion for Attorney Fees and costs in the amount of $2065.00. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on December 19, 2012. (rw)
September 13, 2012 20 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT in favor of Dawn Shaw against Allied Interstate in the amount of $750.00, re 19 Notice of Acceptance with offer of judgment. Signed by Christopher R. Johnson, Clerk on September 13, 2012. (sh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shaw v. Allied Interstate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dawn Shaw
Represented By: Tara L. Patterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Allied Interstate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?