Martin v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
||Leeandra L Martin
||Social Security Administration Commissioner
||April 11, 2012
||US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
||Fort Smith Office
||James R. Marschewski
|Nature of Suit:
||Supplemental Security Income
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 405
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|November 13, 2013
ORDER granting Attorney Fees in the amount of $5,353.50. This amount should be paid in addition to, and not out of, any past due benefits which plaintiff may be awarded in the future. Further, any EAJA award by this Court should be made payable to plaintiff and not counsel; further granting 12 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on November 13, 2013. (rw)
|June 27, 2013
JUDGMENT REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER AND REMANDING THIS CASE TO THE COMMISSIONER FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) as set forth in the 10 Memorandum Opinion. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on June 27, 2013. (lw)
|April 11, 2012
ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and 2 Motion for Service and DIRECTING SERVICE on Social Security Administration Commissioner. The plaintiff is directed to serve a copy of the complaint and this order on the defenda nt by certified mail, return receipt requested, as well as the US Attorney General and US Attorney for Western District/Arkansas without prepayment of fees and costs. Defendant is to answer within 60 days from the date of service. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on April 11, 2012. (sh)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?