Leach v. Kelley
Plaintiff: Raymond David Leach, III
Defendant: Wendy Kelley
Case Number: 2:2016cv02023
Filed: February 5, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
Office: Fort Smith Office
County: Polk
Presiding Judge: Mark E. Ford
Presiding Judge: P. K. Holmes
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on August 8, 2018. (hnc)
May 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 65 JUDGMENT pursuant to 64 Order filed this date, the Habeas petition in this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on May 11, 2018. (hnc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Leach v. Kelley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raymond David Leach, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wendy Kelley
Represented By: Karen V. Wallace
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?