Adkins v. University of the Ozarks

Plaintiff: Laurie Adkins
Defendant: University of the Ozarks
Case Number: 2:2016cv02088
Filed: April 15, 2016
Court: Arkansas Western District Court
Office: Fort Smith Office
County: Johnson
Presiding Judge: P. K. Holmes
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 30, 2017 35 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT in favor of University of the Ozarks. against Laurie Adkins. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant University of the Ozarks did not discriminate against Plaintiff Laurie Adkins on the basis of her being a woman, and all claims are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on June 30, 2017. (hnc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adkins v. University of the Ozarks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Laurie Adkins
Represented By: Allison Koile
Represented By: Josh Sanford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: University of the Ozarks
Represented By: Matthew Horan
Represented By: Don A. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?