Hyman v. City of Walnut Ridge, et al
| Natalie Hyman and William Whitfield Hyman |
| The City of Walnut Ridge and Chris Kirksey |
| 2:2018cv02138 |
| August 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Fort Smith Office |
| Sebastian |
| P K Holmes |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Magistrate Notice/Consent Furnished to Plaintiff. (tg) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET for case initiated by Natalie Hyman, William Whitfield Hyman. (tg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Chris Kirksey, The City of Walnut Ridge ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 5006800), filed by William Whitfield Hyman, Natalie Hyman.(tg) |
| TEXT ONLY CLERK'S NOTICE: The following attorney(s) listed on Complaint #1 is (are) not registered for CM/ECF noticing and filing in the Western District of Arkansas:Kesha Chiappinelli. An attorney can register for a CM/ECF login and password if they are admitted to practice in the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas or are admitted pro hac vice for this case. Any non-registered attorney should submit the proper attorney admission petition or file an appropriate motion. Please refer to our website http://www.arwd.uscourts.gov/attorney-information for further information. (tg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
