Steffy v. Fort Smith, City of et al
| Noah Steffy |
| Rick Ruth, Fort Smith, City of, Neighborhood Service Supervisor and Inspectors, City Administrator Carl Geffken and Jimmie Deer |
| 2:2019cv02040 |
| March 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| P K Holmes |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 FINAL SCHEDULING ORDER, as set forth. Jury Trial set for 2/24/2020 09:00 AM in Fort Smith -- 3rd flr (Rm 310) before Honorable P. K. Holmes III.Signed by Jane Ann Short, Courtroom Deputy for Honorable P. K. Holmes III on June 21, 2019. ***Copy of scheduling order mailed to non-CM/ECF participant***(jas) |
| Filing 15 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Noah Steffy. (mjm) |
| Filing 14 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Jimmie Deer, Fort Smith, City of, Carl Geffken, Rick Ruth. (Mann, William) |
| Filing 13 TEXT ONLY ORDER granting in part #12 Motion for Extension of Time to File Rule 26(f) Report. The deadline to file a Rule 26(f) report is extended to June 20, 2019. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes III on May 31, 2019. (rab) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Rule 26(f) Report as to #7 Initial Scheduling Order, by Noah Steffy. (mjm) |
| Filing 11 OPINION AND ORDER denying motions #8 Motion to Strike and #9 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes III on May 13, 2019. (lw) Modified on 5/13/2019 to add text (lw). |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE by Noah Steffy re #6 Defendant's Answer to Complaint. (hnc) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Noah Steffy. (cnn) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Strike Affirmative Defenses by Noah Steffy. (cnn) |
| Filing 7 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 6/6/2019. Jury Trial set for 2/24/2020 09:00 AM in Fort Smith -- 3rd flr (Rm 310) before Honorable P. K. Holmes III.Signed by Jane Ann Short, Courtroom Deputy for Honorable P. K. Holmes III on April 30, 2019. ***Copy of scheduling order mailed to non-CM/ECF participant***(jas) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Jimmie Deer, Fort Smith, City of, Carl Geffken, Rick Ruth.(Mann, William) |
| Filing 5 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS AND CASE PARTICIPANTS. Summons Issued as to Jimmie Deer, Fort Smith, City of, Carl Geffken, Rick Ruth and USM285 Form(s) Delivered to USMS for each defendant for whom summons was issued with the following documents attached: re #3 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form, #1 Complaint, #4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and Motion for Service. (hnc) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and Motion for Service. Further, DIRECTING SERVICE on Jimmie Deer, Fort Smith, City of, Carl Geffken, Rick Ruth. Defendant is to answer within 21 days from the date of service. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on March 25, 2019. (cc: U.S. Marshals Service)(hnc)
|
| Filing 3 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form (hnc) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, MOTION for Service by Noah Steffy. (hnc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jimmie Deer, Fort Smith, City of, Carl Geffken, Neighborhood Service Supervisor and Inspectors, Rick Ruth, filed by Noah Steffy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1: Code of Ordinances)(hnc) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis MOTION for Service. Motions referred to Honorable Mark E. Ford.(hnc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
