Lunsford v. Davis et al
Heath Lunsford |
Mercdes Anderson, Sean McNevin and Shane Davis |
2:2019cv02126 |
October 2, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
Fort Smith Office |
Mark E Ford |
P K Holmes |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE of Change of Address for Heath Lunsford.. There are no documents to resend. (Attachments: #1 Attachment: recieved two notices of address change for same case)(hnc) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Heath Lunsford. Motions referred to Mark E. Ford.(mjm) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Compel by Heath Lunsford. Motions referred to Mark E. Ford.(mjm) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Address for Heath Lunsford. There are no documents to resend. (lw) |
Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Sean McNevin, Mercdes Anderson, Shane Davis, filed by Heath Lunsford.(lw) |
Filing 6 TEXT ONLY ORDER REGARDING COMPLAINT DEFICIENCY. After review of the Complaint, it is determined that the Plaintiff did not submit the complaint on the court-approved form for this District. For this reason, Plaintiff is directed to submit an Amended Complaint within 21 days of the date of this Order. The Clerk is directed to mail the Plaintiff a court-approved 1983 form.In the Amended Complaint, Plaintiff must write short, plain statements telling the Court: the constitutional right Plaintiff believes was violated;the name of the Defendant who violated the right;exactly what the Defendant did or failed to do;how the action or inaction of that Defendant is connected to the violation of the constitutional rights;and what specific injury Plaintiff suffered because of the misconduct of that Defendant. See Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362,371-72,377 (1976);Fed.R.Civ.P.8. Plaintiff must repeat this process for each person he has named as a Defendant. Plaintiff is CAUTIONED that he must affirmatively link the conduct of each named Defendant with the specific injury he suffered. If he fails to do so, the allegations against that Defendant will be dismissed for failure to state a claim.Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is a First Amended Complaint. The First Amended Complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its entirety on the court-approved form. You may not refer back to any part of the original complaint. A First Amended Complaint supersedes, or takes the place of, the original Complaint. After amendment, the Court will treat the original Complaint as nonexistent. Any cause of action that was raised in the original Complaint is waived if it is not raised in the First Amended Complaint. This case shall be subject to dismissal if Plaintiff fails to return the Amended Complaint to the Court by the deadline. CLERK TO FOLLOW UP Amended Complaint due by 10/29/2019. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on October 8, 2019. (klk) |
Filing 5 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form. (lw) (lw). |
Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Arkansas Eastern; Case Number 4:19-cv-00681. Docket sheet received. |
TEXT ONLY NOTICE: COMPLAINT REFERRED (42:1983) transferred in from Eastern District of Arkansas. (lw) |
MOTIONS REFERRED to Honorable Mark E. Ford: #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Heath Lunsford. Motions referred to Honorable Mark E. Ford.(lw) |
Filing 3 ORDER directing the Clerk to immediately transfer the entire case file to the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. The #1 pending motion to proceed in forma pauperis is left to the Western District. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/1/2019. (jbh) [Transferred from ared on 10/2/2019.] |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Heath Lunsford. (ljb) [Transferred from ared on 10/2/2019.] |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Heath Lunsford. (ljb) [Transferred from ared on 10/2/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.