Powell v. Rogers et al
| Terence Christopher Powell |
| Deputy Sammy Rogers and Officer Judkins |
| 2:2020cv02133 |
| August 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Mark E Ford |
| P K Holmes |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE by Judkins, Sammy Rogers re #12 Supplement . (Hollowell, Melissa) |
| Filing 12 SUPPLEMENT by Plaintiff Terence Christopher Powell. (lw) |
| Filing 11 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. Please see attached document for complete deadline information. Summary Judgment Motion due by 1/25/2021. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on August 28, 2020. (djm) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint Referred (42:1983) with Jury Demand by Judkins, Sammy Rogers.(Hollowell, Melissa) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Terence Christopher Powell. Sammy Rogers served on 8/11/2020, answer due 9/1/2020. (lw) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Terence Christopher Powell. Judkins served on 8/11/2020, answer due 9/1/2020. (lw) |
| Filing 7 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS AND CASE PARTICIPANTS. Summons Issued as to Judkins, Sammy Rogers and USM285 Form(s) Delivered to USMS for each defendant for whom summons was issued with the following documents attached: re #6 Order Directing Service, #1 Complaint Referred (42:1983), #4 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form. (mjm) |
Filing 6
ORDER DIRECTING THE MARSHALS SERVICE TO SERVE Judkins, Sammy Rogers and granting 21 days to answer. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on August 5, 2020. (cc: U.S. Marshals Service-Certified).(mjm)
|
| Filing 5 CLERK'S ORDER re PLRA Initial Fee directing Sebastian County Detention Center to collect from petitioner's prison account an initial partial filing fee of $24.67; thereafter to collect monthly payments from petitioner's prison account in amount equal to 20% of preceding month's income credited to account until $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. (mjm) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form. (mjm) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983). Pursuant to the provisions of the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act, the Clerk is directed to collect the filing fee from the Plaintiff.Plaintiff is advised that he is required to immediately inform the Court of any change of address. If Plaintiff is transferred to another jail or prison or released, he shall have 30 days from the date of transfer or release in which to notify the Court of the new address. Plaintiff shall submit a change of address on a separate piece of paper entitled Notice to the Court of Change of Address and not include any motions or otherwise request relief in this document. The notice shall contain only information pertaining to the address change. The case will be subject to dismissal if Plaintiff fails to inform the Court of an address change. The Clerk is directed to collect the filing fee in the amount of $350.00. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on August 3, 2020. (mjm)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983) by Terence Christopher Powell. Motions referred to Mark E. Ford.(mjm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT REFERRED (42:1983) against Judkins, Sammy Rogers, filed by Terence Christopher Powell.(mjm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
