Powell v. Arnoldussen et al
| Terence Christopher Powell |
| Deputy Arnoldussen, Corporal Risley and John or Jane Doe Nurses |
| 2:2020cv02185 |
| October 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Mark E Ford |
| P K Holmes |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Mail Returned as Undeliverable marked Not uneliverable as addressed. Mail originally sent to Terence Christopher Powell at Sebastian County Detention Center including 7 Order to Show Cause - Failure to Obey Order-TEXT ONLY. Resent to Terence Christopher Powell #161381 ADC - CUMMINS UNIT, P. O. Box 500, Grady, AR 71644-0500. (mjm) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Address for Terence Powell. There are no documents to resend. (mjm) |
| Filing 7 TEXT ONLY SHOW CAUSE ORDER - FAILURE TO OBEY ORDER. The Court entered an Order (ECF No. 6) directing Plaintiff to provide a certificate of account with his in forma pauperis application by November 24, 2020. This Order was not returned as undeliverable. Plaintiff did not respond. Plaintiff is given 21 days to show cause why he failed to obey the Order of the Court. If Plaintiff fails to respond by the deadline, this case shall be subject to dismissal. Show Cause Response due by 12/21/2020. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on November 30, 2020. (smg) |
| Filing 6 TEXT ONLY ORDER REGARDING In Forma Pauperis Application. With his complaint, Plaintiff submitted an in forma pauperis (IFP) application. However, he failed to have the certification regarding inmate funds held in his name completed for the IFP application. For this reason, the Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a blank Prisoner IFP Application. Plaintiff is given 21 days from the date of this Order to either have the certificate portion of the IFP application completed by the appropriate detention center official and return the application to the Court for review and filing or pay the 350.00 dollar filing fee and 50.00 dollar administrative fee, a total of 400.00 dollars. This case shall be subject to dismissal for failure to obey an order of the Court if Plaintiff fails to return the completed IFP application or pay the 400.00 dollar filing fee by the deadline. CLERK TO FOLLOW UP Completed IFP due by 11/24/2020. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on November 3, 2020. (klk) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983) by Terence Christopher Powell. Motions referred to Mark E. Ford.(mjm) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form. (mjm) |
Filing 3
ORDER that the matter has been provisionally filed as the undersigned finds that additional information is needed to rule on Plaintiff's IFP application. Specifically the Court requires the following information: signed certificate of account. Failure to comply within the time period specified could result in summary dismissal for failure to obey a court order. Completed IFP due by 11/3/2020. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on October 15, 2020. (mjm)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983) by Terence Christopher Powell. Motions referred to Mark E. Ford.(mjm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT REFERRED (42:1983) against Arnoldussen, John or Jane Doe Nurses, Risley, filed by Terence Christopher Powell.(mjm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
