Geren v. Laster, P.A.
Hailey Geren |
Dr. Shane F. Laster, P.A. doing business as Laster Eye Center |
2:2020cv02246 |
December 29, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
P K Holmes |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 FINAL SCHEDULING ORDER, as set forth. Jury Trial set for 11/8/2021 09:00 AM in Fort Smith -- 3rd flr (Rm 310) before Honorable P. K. Holmes III. Signed by Jane Ann Short, Courtroom Deputy for Honorable P. K. Holmes III on February 8, 2021. (jas) |
Filing 8 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Shane F. Laster, P.A.. (Campbell, Katherine) |
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Shane F. Laster, P.A.. (Campbell, Katherine) |
Filing 6 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 2/10/2021. Jury Trial set for 11/8/2021 09:00 AM in Fort Smith -- 3rd flr (Rm 310) before Honorable P. K. Holmes III. Signed by Jane Ann Short, Courtroom Deputy for Honorable P. K. Holmes III on January 4, 2021. (jas) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to #4 Complaint with Jury Demand by Shane F. Laster, P.A..(Campbell, Katherine) |
Filing 4 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Shane F. Laster, P.A., filed by Hailey Geren. (Originally filed in the Circuit Court of Sebastian County on 11/12/2020 in case 66CV-20-817)(mjm) |
Filing 3 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form. (mjm) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Sebastian County, case number 66CV-20-817., filed by Shane F. Laster, P.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1: State Court Pleadings)(mjm) |
Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET for case initiated by Shane F. Laster, P.A.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1: State Court Pleadings) (mjm) (Main Document 1 replaced on 12/29/2020) (mjm). |
Notice of Removal filing fee paid re #2 Notice of Removal : $ 402, receipt number AARWDC-2301626.. (Campbell, Katherine) |
CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING FILING FEE. The following document was received and filed without the appropriate filing fee: #2 Notice of Removal. You MUST pay the filing fee of $402.00 or file a motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis, if appropriate, within 2 business days.If the proper fees or motion are not received for case initiating documents, your case may be subject to dismissal.Present your payment to the appropriate Divisional Office or Pay Online, using the Civil -> Other Documents -> Filing Fee Submitted event. Filing Fee due by 12/31/2020.(mjm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Geren v. Laster, P.A. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Hailey Geren | |
Represented By: | Joe D. Byars, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Dr. Shane F. Laster, P.A. doing business as Laster Eye Center | |
Represented By: | Katherine Church Campbell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.