Savana Martinez v. Performed Line Products Company et al
| Savana Martinez |
| Performed Line Products Company, Techline, Inc. and John Does 1-10 |
| 2:2021cv02131 |
| August 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| P K Holmes |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 FINAL SCHEDULING ORDER, as set forth. Jury Trial set for 7/11/2022 09:00 AM in Fort Smith -- 3rd flr (Rm 310) before Honorable P. K. Holmes III. Signed by Jane Ann Short, Courtroom Deputy for Honorable P. K. Holmes III on September 21, 2021. (jas) |
| Filing 8 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Techline, Inc.. (Young, Regina) |
| Filing 7 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 9/22/2021. Jury Trial set for 7/11/2022 09:00 AM in Fort Smith -- 3rd flr (Rm 310) before Honorable P. K. Holmes III. Signed by Jane Ann Short, Courtroom Deputy for Honorable P. K. Holmes III on August 16, 2021. (jas) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #4 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Performed Line Products Company.(Markham, Amy) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #4 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Techline, Inc..(Young, Regina) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Performed Line Products Company, Techline, Inc., John Does 1-10, filed by Savana Martinez (Originally filed in Circuit Court of Logan County, Arkansas on 6/21/21 in case number 42BCV-21-00048) (jlm) Modified on 8/12/2021 to edit text(jlm). |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form (jlm) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Logan County, case number 42BCV-21-00048., filed by Performed Line Products Company, Techline, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Supplement B)(jlm) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET for case initiated by Performed Line Products Company, Techline, Inc. (jlm) |
| TEXT ONLY CLERK'S NOTICE: The following attorney(s) listed on Civil Cover Sheet #1 is (are) not registered for CM/ECF noticing and filing in the Western District of Arkansas:Chris Woodard. An attorney can register through PACER for a CM/ECF login and password if they are admitted to practice in the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas or are admitted pro hac vice for this case. Any non-registered attorney should submit the proper attorney admission petition or file an appropriate motion. Please refer to our website http://www.arwd.uscourts.gov/attorney-information for further information. (jlm) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING FILING FEE. The following document was received and filed without the appropriate filing fee: #2 Notice of Removal. You MUST pay the filing fee of $402.00 or file a motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis, if appropriate, within 2 business days.If the proper fees or motion are not received for case initiating documents, your case may be subject to dismissal.Present your payment to the appropriate Divisional Office or Pay Online, using the Civil -> Other Documents -> Filing Fee Submitted event. Filing Fee due by 8/16/2021 (jlm) |
| TEXT ONLY CLERK'S ORDER requiring parties to request a trial by jury within 14 days from date of this order, if desired and allowed by law. (jlm) |
| Notice of Removal filing fee paid re #2 Notice of Removal : $ 402, receipt number AARWDC-2441783.. (Young, Regina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
