Sexton, Jr. v. McKittrick
| Robert Dean Sexton, Jr. |
| Jail Administrator Nick McKittrick and Nick McKittrick |
| 2:2021cv02152 |
| September 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Mark E Ford |
| P K Holmes |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable marked Unable to Forward. Mail originally sent to Robert Dean Sexton, Jr. at 300 Porter Industrial Road, Clarksville, AR 72830 including #2 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form, #1 Complaint Referred (42:1983) filed by Robert Dean Sexton, Jr., #3 Order Provisionally Filing Complaint. No new address available. New Address due by 11/29/2021. (lw) |
Filing 3
ORDER that the matter has been provisionally filed as the undersigned finds that additional information is needed to rule on Plaintiff's IFP application. Specifically the Court requires the following information: completed IFP. Failure to comply within the time period specified could result in summary dismissal for failure to obey a court order. Completed IFP due by 10/15/2021. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on September 24, 2021. (jlm)
|
| Filing 2 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form (jlm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT REFERRED (42:1983) against Nick McKittrick, filed by Robert Dean Sexton, Jr..(jlm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
