Williams v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
| Alvin Lee Williams |
| Social Security Administration Commissioner |
| 2:2022cv02121 |
| July 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Mark E Ford |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 APPEAL BRIEF (SOCIAL SECURITY) by Alvin Lee Williams. (Vammen, Fritzie) |
| Filing 13 *** DISREGARD ATTORNEY DIRECTED TO REFILE USING CORRECT EVENT*** MEMORANDUM BRIEF in Support Plaintiff by Alvin Lee Williams. (Vammen, Fritzie) Modified on 9/20/2022 (cnn). |
| Filing 12 TEXT ONLY SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER. Plaintiff must file a brief within (30) days of the date the transcript is filed. Plaintiff's failure to file a timely brief may result in dismissal for failure to prosecute. All briefs are limited to twenty (20) pages in length and must identify the specific points for appeal with references to the medical evidence supporting each point, transcript page numbers for all medical evidence referenced, and citations to case-law supporting the parties' positions. The briefs must also include the transcript page numbers of any duplicative and/or irrelevant medical records. Any brief found to be in noncompliance with these briefing rules may be stricken from the record. The Commissioner must file a brief within thirty (30) days of the date Plaintiff's brief is served, responding to the issues raised in the Plaintiff's brief. Additional relevant issues may also be raised, in accordance with the above briefing specifications and limitations.A reply brief may be filed within seven (7) days after the response brief is filed and shall be limited to those issues raised in the response brief that were not previously addressed.All Social Security Appeal cases will be scheduled for oral argument once the briefs have been filed. A scheduling notice will be issued and the case placed on the calendar for oral argument as soon as can reasonably be permitted under Court policies, but not earlier than sixty (60) days following the filing of the appeal brief by the Social Security Commissioner. The scheduling order will indicate the date, time, and location of the oral argument. Requests for continuance of oral argument, appearance via video conferencing or telephonic means, and waiver of oral argument must be made by formal motion as soon as possible following entry of the entry of the scheduling order. Said motions will be considered on a case-by-case basis, unless otherwise directed in the scheduling order. Plaintiffs SSA Appeal Brief due by 10/3/2022. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on September 6, 2022. (cla) |
| Filing 11 SOCIAL SECURITY TRANSCRIPT by Social Security Administration Commissioner. (Taylor, Candace) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #2 Complaint by Social Security Administration Commissioner.(Silverman, Marisa) |
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint, filed by Alvin Lee Williams. Social Security Administration Commissioner served on 8/1/2022, answer due 09/30/2022. (Attachments: #1 US Mail Conf US Attny, #2 US Mail Conf AG, #3 US Mail Conf Commissioner)(Vammen, Fritzie) Modified on 8/8/2022 to correct service and answer due dates (mjm). |
| Filing 8 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS AND CASE PARTICIPANTS. Summons Reissued as to Social Security Administration Commissioner (US Attorney) and returned to attorney or plaintiff for service. YOU MUST PRINT THIS ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH IS THE MAIN DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (mjm) |
| Filing 7 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS. Summons Requested for USA Agency, Corporation, Officers or Employees as to Alvin Williams for service of the following document: #2 Complaint. (Vammen, Fritzie) |
| Filing 6 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS AND CASE PARTICIPANTS. Summons Issued as to Social Security Administration Commissioner, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General and returned to attorney or plaintiff for service. YOU MUST PRINT THIS ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH IS THE MAIN DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (mjm) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT TO ASSIGNMENT to U.S. Magistrate Judge by Alvin Lee Williams. Government consent acknowledged pursuant to Standing Consent Letter. (Vammen, Fritzie) |
| Filing 4 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS. Summons Requested for USA Agency, Corporation, Officers or Employees as to Alvin Lee Williams for service of the following document: #2 Complaint. (Vammen, Fritzie) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF DIRECT ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE. This case has been assigned to a U.S. Magistrate Judge to conduct all proceedings and for entry of a final judgment. You must file the attached form memorializing consent or requesting reassignment to a District Judge within fourteen (14) days. Consent or Reassignment form due by 8/8/2022. (Attachments: #1 Consent/Reassignment Form)(mjm) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT Alvin Lee Williams against Social Security Administration Commissioner ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AARWDC-2628478), filed by Alvin Lee Williams.(Vammen, Fritzie) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Alvin Lee Williams. Please proceed with filing your case initiating document(s).If the case initiating documents are not filed by Close of Business the next business day, this file may be closed.A civil action is commenced by filing a complaint with the Court (Fed.R.Civ.P.3). (mjm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
