Sanchez v. Hicks et al
| Jesus Armando Aguirre Sanchez |
| Deputy Hicks, Deputy Chase, Deputy Hardwick, Corporal Mongol, Deputy Okinouski, Captain Fields and Sergeant Baker |
| 2:2023cv02011 |
| January 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Mark E Ford |
| P K Holmes |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jesus Armando Aguirre Sanchez. Baker served on 3/9/2023, answer due 3/30/2023; Hardwick served on 3/9/2023, answer due 3/30/2023; Hicks served on 3/9/2023, answer due 3/30/2023; Mongol served on 3/9/2023, answer due 3/30/2023; Okinouski served on 3/9/2023, answer due 3/30/2023. (tmc) |
| Filing 12 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS AND CASE PARTICIPANTS. Summons Issued as to Baker, Hardwick, Hicks, Mongol, Okinouski and USM285 Form(s) Delivered to USMS for each defendant for whom summons was issued with the following documents attached: re #10 Amended Complaint, #11 Order Directing Service, #4 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form. (jlm) |
Filing 11
ORDER DIRECTING THE MARSHALS SERVICE TO SERVE Baker, Hardwick, Hicks, Mongol, Okinouski and granting 21 days to answer. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on March 6, 2023. (jlm)
|
| Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT as to #7 Amended Complaint, against Okinouski, Chase, Fields, Hicks, Baker, Hardwick, Mongol, filed by Jesus Armando Aguirre Sanchez. Related document: #7 Amended Complaint, filed by Jesus Armando Aguirre Sanchez.(jlm) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER DIRECTING that an Amended Complaint be filed. Amended Complaint due by 3/15/2023.. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on February 15, 2023. (jlm)
|
| Filing 8 **DISREGARD FILED IN WRONG CASE** TEXT ONLY ORDER REGARDING COMPLAINT DEFICIENCY. The Court has identified potential legal and factual deficiences with the Amended Complaint, (ECF No. 7), that may result in its dismissal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. s. 1915A(a). For this reason, Plaintiff is directed to submit a Second Amended Complaint within 21 days of the date of this Order. The Clerk is directed to mail the Plaintiff a court-approved 1983 form. In the Second Amended Complaint, Plaintiff must write short, plain statements telling the Court: the constitutional right Plaintiff believes was violated; the name of the Defendant who violated the right; exactly what each Defendant did or failed to do and when; how the action or inaction of that Defendant is connected to the violation of the constitutional rights; and what specific injury Plaintiff suffered because of the misconduct of that Defendant. See Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362,371-72,377 (1976);Fed.R.Civ.P.8. Plaintiff must repeat this process for each person he has named as a Defendant. If Plaintiff does not know the full name of a defendant, Plaintiff is directed to provide as much identifying information as possible about that defendant. Plaintiff is CAUTIONED that he must affirmatively link the conduct of each named Defendant with the specific injury he suffered. If he fails to do so, the allegations against that Defendant will be dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is a Second Amended Complaint. The Second Amended Complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its entirety on the court-approved form. The Second Amended Complaint may not refer back to any part of the original complaint. An amended complaint supersedes, or takes the place of, the original Complaint. After amendment, the Court will treat the original Complaint and the First Amended Complaint as nonexistent. Any cause of action that was raised in the original Complaint or First Amended Complaint is waived (or will not be considered) if it is not also raised in the Second Amended Complaint. This case shall be subject to dismissal if Plaintiff fails to return the Second Amended Complaint to the Court by the deadline. CLERK TO FOLLOW UP Second Amended Complaint due by 3/9/2023. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on February 16, 2023. (ksb) Modified on 2/16/2023 (jlm). |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT as to #1 Complaint Referred (42:1983) against Okinouski, Chase, Fields, Hicks, Baker, Hardwick, Mongol, filed by Jesus Armando Aguirre Sanchez. Related document: #1 Complaint Referred (42:1983) filed by Jesus Armando Aguirre Sanchez.(jlm) |
| Filing 6 TEXT ONLY ORDER REGARDING COMPLAINT DEFICIENCY. After review of the Complaint, it is determined that the Plaintiff did not indicate the date(s) of occurrence for the incident or incidents in his Complaint. For this reason, Plaintiff is directed to submit an Amended Complaint within 21 days of the date of this Order. The Clerk is directed to mail the Plaintiff a court-approved 1983 form.In the Amended Complaint, Plaintiff must write short, plain statements telling the Court: the constitutional right Plaintiff believes was violated;the name of the Defendant who violated the right;exactly what the Defendant did or failed to do;how the action or inaction of that Defendant is connected to the violation of the constitutional rights;and what specific injury Plaintiff suffered because of the misconduct of that Defendant. See Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362,371-72,377 (1976);Fed.R.Civ.P.8. Plaintiff must repeat this process for each person he has named as a Defendant. Plaintiff is CAUTIONED that he must affirmatively link the conduct of each named Defendant with the specific injury he suffered. If he fails to do so, the allegations against that Defendant will be dismissed for failure to state a claim.Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is a First Amended Complaint. The First Amended Complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its entirety on the court-approved form. You may not refer back to any part of the original complaint. A First Amended Complaint supersedes, or takes the place of, the original Complaint. After amendment, the Court will treat the original Complaint as nonexistent. Any cause of action that was raised in the original Complaint is waived if it is not raised in the First Amended Complaint. This case shall be subject to dismissal if Plaintiff fails to return the Amended Complaint to the Court by the deadline. CLERK TO FOLLOW UP Amended Complaint due by 2/17/2023. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on January 27, 2023. (klk) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S ORDER re PLRA Initial Fee directing Crawford County Justice Center to collect from petitioner's prison account an initial partial filing fee of $14.82; thereafter to collect monthly payments from petitioner's prison account in amount equal to 20% of preceding month's income credited to account until $350.00 filing fee is paid in full (cc: Crawford County Justice Center). (jlm) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form (jlm) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983). Pursuant to the provisions of the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act, the Clerk is directed to collect the filing fee from the Plaintiff.Plaintiff is advised that he is required to immediately inform the Court of any change of address. If Plaintiff is transferred to another jail or prison or released, he shall have 30 days from the date of transfer or release in which to notify the Court of the new address. Plaintiff shall submit a change of address on a separate piece of paper entitled Notice to the Court of Change of Address and not include any motions or otherwise request relief in this document. The notice shall contain only information pertaining to the address change. The case will be subject to dismissal if Plaintiff fails to inform the Court of an address change. The Clerk is directed to collect the filing fee in the amount of $350.00. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on January 17, 2023. (jlm)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983) by Jesus Armando Aguirre Sanchez. Motions referred to Mark E. Ford.(jlm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT REFERRED (42:1983) against Chase, Fields, Hardwick, Baker, Hicks, Mongol, Okinouski, filed by Jesus Armando Aguirre Sanchez.(jlm) Modified on 1/19/2023 to edit text (jlm). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
