Bosco v. City of Fort Smith et al
| Martin Bosco |
| City of Fort Smith, Carl Geffken, Lance McAvoy, Rick Lolley, City Administrator Carl Geffken, Dir of Utilities Lance McAvoy and Director of HR Rick Lolley |
| 2:2023cv02024 |
| February 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| P K Holmes |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 4/24/2023. Jury Trial set for 1/29/2024 09:00 AM in Fort Smith -- 3rd flr (Rm 310) before Honorable P. K. Holmes III. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes III on March 16, 2023. (mjm) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #2 Complaint by City of Fort Smith, Carl Geffken, Rick Lolley, Lance McAvoy.(Carson, Douglas) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form (jlm) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AARWDC-2727704), filed by Martin Bosco.(Vandiver, Brian) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Martin Bosco. Please proceed with filing your case initiating document(s).If the case initiating documents are not filed by Close of Business the next business day, this file may be closed.A civil action is commenced by filing a complaint with the Court (Fed.R.Civ.P.3). (jlm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
