Cant et al v. Mena Regional Health System et al
Chris Cant and Timothy Craig |
Mena Regional Health System doing business as Mena Hospital Commission and John Doe Insurance Carrier |
2:2023cv02027 |
February 15, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
P K Holmes |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Chris Cant, Timothy Craig. (Pulliam, Randall) |
Filing 9 RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Chris Cant, Timothy Craig. (Pulliam, Randall) |
Filing 8 TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Plaintiffs' response to the Motion to Dismiss #5 due on or before April 5, 2023. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes III on March 21, 2023. (mc) |
Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Chris Cant, Timothy Craig. (Pulliam, Randall) |
Filing 6 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 4/14/2023. Jury Trial set for 1/29/2024 09:00 AM in Fort Smith -- 3rd flr (Rm 310) before Honorable P. K. Holmes III. Signed by Michelle McEntire Courtroom Deputy for Honorable P. K. Holmes III on March 8, 2023. (mjm) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Mena Regional Health System. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Complaint)(Lowe, Timothy) |
TEXT ONLY CLERK'S NOTICE in Removal Case re Service of Process directing Plaintiffs Chris Cant, Timothy Craig to file affidavits of service (or copies of proof of service filed in state court) for defendant (John Doe Insurance Carrier) who have already been served with summons and a copy of the complaint, and file proof of service in this court regarding defendant to be served in the future. If service is not perfected on a defendant within 90 days after filing the complaint, a show cause order will issue and the complaint against that defendant is subject to dismissal pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4(m) (jlm) |
Set Answer Deadlines: Mena Regional Health System answer due 3/8/2023. (tg) |
Filing 4 STATE COURT COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Mena Regional Health System, John Doe Insurance Carrier, filed by Chris Cant, Timothy Craig.(jlm) Modified on 2/15/2023 to add text (mjm). |
Filing 3 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form (jlm) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Polk County, case number 57CV-23-12., filed by Mena Regional Health System.(jlm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/15/2023: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (jlm). |
Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Mena Regional Health System. (jlm) |
CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING FILING FEE. The following document was received and filed without the appropriate filing fee: #2 Notice of Removal. You MUST pay the filing fee of $ 402.00 or file a motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis, if appropriate, within 2 business days.If the proper fees or motion are not received for case initiating documents, your case may be subject to dismissal.Present your payment to the appropriate Divisional Office or Pay Online, using the Civil -> Other Documents -> Filing Fee Submitted event. Filing Fee due by 2/17/2023 (jlm) |
Notice of Removal filing fee paid re Clerk's Notice Regarding Filing Fee,, #2 Notice of Removal : $ 402, receipt number AARWDC-2729978.. (Lowe, Timothy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.