Luper v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
| Patrick G Luper |
| Social Security Administration Commissioner |
| 2:2023cv02078 |
| June 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Mark E Ford |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
TEXT ONLY ENTRY FILED FOR ECF PURPOSES ONLY (src)
|
|
Filing 6
JUDGMENT, For the reasons stated in the Courts Memorandum Opinion and Order of Dismissal #5 , the clerk is ordered to dismiss the Plaintiffs Complaint with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on June 14, 2023. (tmc)
|
|
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting #4 Motion to Dismiss filed by Patrick G Luper. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on June 14, 2023. (tmc) Modified on 7/20/2023 (src).
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Dismiss by Patrick G Luper. (Ray, Blake)
|
|
Filing 3
COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration Commissioner, filed by Patrick G Luper.(Ray, Blake)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE OF DIRECT ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE. This case has been assigned to a U.S. Magistrate Judge to conduct all proceedings and for entry of a final judgment. You must file the attached form memorializing consent or requesting reassignment to a District Judge within fourteen (14) days. Consent or Reassignment form due by 6/23/2023. (tmc)
|
|
Filing 1
CIVIL COVER SHEET by Patrick G Luper. Please proceed with filing your case initiating document(s).If the case initiating documents are not filed by Close of Business the next business day, this file may be closed.A civil action is commenced by filing a complaint with the Court (Fed.R.Civ.P.3). (tmc)
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING FILING FEE. The following document was received and filed without the appropriate filing fee: #3 Complaint. You MUST pay the filing fee of $ 402.00 or file a motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis, if appropriate, within 2 business days.If the proper fees or motion are not received for case initiating documents, your case may be subject to dismissal.Present your payment to the appropriate Divisional Office or Pay Online, using the Civil -> Other Documents -> Filing Fee Submitted event. Filing Fee due by 6/12/2023 (tmc)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Luper v. Social Security Administration Commissioner | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Patrick G Luper | |
| Represented By: | Blake Anthony Ray, Jr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Social Security Administration Commissioner | |
| Represented By: | USAARW Social Security |
| Represented By: | Candace L. Taylor |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
