Knapp v. Runion et al
| Anthony Charles Knapp |
| Sheriff Hobe Runion and Jane or John Doe Jail Administrator |
| 2:2023cv02086 |
| June 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Mark E Ford |
| P K Holmes |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint filed by Anthony Charles Knapp. Objections to R&R due by 8/28/2023. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on August 11, 2023. (jlm) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form (jlm) |
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If Plaintiff moves or is re-incarcerated, he shall have 30 days from the date of the move or re-incarceration in which to notify the Court of his new address. Failure to inform the Court of an address change shall result in the dismissal of this case. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on June 27, 2023. (jlm)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Anthony Charles Knapp. (jlm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jane or John Doe Jail Administrator, Hobe Runion, filed by Anthony Charles Knapp.(jlm) |
| CASE REFERRED to Honorable Mark E. Ford. (hnc) |
| TEXT ONLY NOTICE: COMPLAINT REFERRED (42:1983) (hnc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
