Johnson v. Trump et al
| Robert W Johnson |
| Donald J Trump, Facebook, Meta LLC, Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, Mark Meadows, Kenneth Chesebro, Jeffrey Clark, Jenna Ellis, Ray Smith, III, Robert Cheeley, Cathleen Latham, Scott Hall, Stephen Lee, Harrison Floyd, Trevian Kutti, Sidney Powell, Misty Hampton, Michael Roman, David Shafer, Shawn Still, Vldimir Putin and Twitter |
| 2:2023cv02109 |
| August 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Susan O Hickey |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER ADOPTING #9 Report and Recommendations in toto; Plaintiffs Complaint, as supplemented (ECF Nos. 2, 8), should be and hereby is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on October 24, 2023. (tmc)
|
| Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #2 Complaint and #8 Supplement, filed by Robert W Johnson. Objections to R&R due by 10/16/2023. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on September 29, 2023. (tmc) |
| Filing 8 SUPPLEMENT by Plaintiff Robert W Johnson to #2 Complaint. (tmc) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and MOTION for Service by Robert W Johnson. (tmc) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED to Honorable Mark E. Ford: #7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and MOTION for Service filed by Robert W Johnson. Motions referred to Honorable Mark E. Ford.(tmc) |
| Filing 6 TEXT ONLY ORDER REGARDING COMPLAINT DEFICIENCY. After review of the Complaint, it is determined that the Plaintiff has not clearly stated how each named Defendant violated his federal constitutional rights, and some of his claims may be frivolous. For this reason, Plaintiff is directed to submit an Amended Complaint within 21 days of the date of this Order. The Clerk is directed to mail the Plaintiff a court-approved 1983 form.In the Amended Complaint, Plaintiff must write short, plain statements telling the Court: the constitutional right Plaintiff believes was violated;the name of the Defendant who violated the right;exactly what the Defendant did or failed to do;how the action or inaction of that Defendant is connected to the violation of the constitutional rights;and what specific injury Plaintiff suffered because of the misconduct of that Defendant. See Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362,371-72,377 (1976);Fed.R.Civ.P.8. Plaintiff must repeat this process for each person he has named as a Defendant. Plaintiff is CAUTIONED that he must affirmatively link the conduct of each named Defendant with the specific injury he suffered. If he fails to do so, the allegations against that Defendant will be dismissed for failure to state a claim.Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is a First Amended Complaint. The First Amended Complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its entirety on the court-approved form. You may not refer back to any part of the original complaint. A First Amended Complaint supersedes, or takes the place of, the original Complaint. After amendment, the Court will treat the original Complaint as nonexistent. Any cause of action that was raised in the original Complaint is waived if it is not raised in the First Amended Complaint. This case shall be subject to dismissal if Plaintiff fails to return the Amended Complaint to the Court by the deadline. CLERK TO FOLLOW UP Amended Complaint due by 9/20/2023. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on August 30, 2023. (klk) |
| Filing 5 TEXT ONLY ORDER REGARDING In Forma Pauperis Application. With his complaint, Plaintiff submitted an in forma pauperis (IFP) application. However, the application is incomplete because it is missing pages and not signed under oath or penalty of perjury. For this reason, the Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a blank IFP application. Plaintiff is given 21 days from the date of this Order to either return the completed application to this court for review and filing or pay the 350.00 dollar filing fee and 52.00 dollar administrative fee, a total of 402.00 dollars. This case shall be subject to dismissal for failure to obey an order of the Court if Plaintiff fails to return the completed IFP application or pay the 402.00 dollar filing fee by the deadline. CLERK TO FOLLOW UP Completed IFP due by 9/20/2023. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on August 30, 2023. (klk) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form (tmc) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and MOTION for Service by Robert W Johnson. (tmc) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Robert Cheeley, Kenneth Chesebro, Jeffrey Clark, John Eastman, Jenna Ellis, Facebook, Harrison Floyd, Rudy Giuliani, Scott Hall, Misty Hampton, Trevian Kutti, Cathleen Latham, Stephen Lee, Meta LLC, Sidney Powell, Vldimir Putin, Michael Roman, David Shafer, Ray Smith, III, Shawn Still, Donald J Trump, and Twitter, filed by Robert W Johnson.(tmc) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Robert W Johnson. (tmc) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED : #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and MOTION for Service filed by Robert W Johnson. Motions referred to Honorable Mark E. Ford.(tmc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
