Garcia v. Averitt Express, Inc. et al
| Joshua Garcia |
| Averitt Express, Inc. and John James |
| 2:2024cv02011 |
| January 19, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| P K Holmes |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Averitt Express, Inc., John James. (Fairley, J.) |
| Filing 13 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 3/20/2024. Jury Trial set for 12/16/2024 09:00 AM in Fort Smith -- 3rd flr (Rm 310) before Honorable P. K. Holmes III. Signed by Michelle McEntire, Courtroom Deputy for Honorable P. K. Holmes III on February 13, 2024. (mjm) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #3 Complaint with Jury Demand by Averitt Express, Inc., John James.(Fairley, J.) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Adam D. Franks on behalf of Averitt Express, Inc., John James. (Franks, Adam) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by J. Carter Fairley on behalf of Averitt Express, Inc., John James. (Fairley, J.) |
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Affidavit of Service, filed by Joshua Garcia. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Email in re Accepting Service, #2 Exhibit Initial Service Package 2-5-24, #3 Exhibit Followup Service Package 2-6-24, #4 Exhibit Waivers Received)(Niblock, Raymond) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Joshua Garcia. John James was sent waiver on 2/6/2024, answer due 4/8/2024. (Niblock, Raymond) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Joshua Garcia. Averitt Express, Inc. was sent waiver on 2/6/2024, answer due 4/8/2024. (Niblock, Raymond) |
| TEXT ONLY CLERK'S NOTICE re Multiple Attorneys Listed on Pleading directed to Defendants Averitt Express, Inc., John James. Notice of Removal #2 lists multiple attorneys appearing for the filer. The following attorney, who did not sign the pleading, must enter a separate Notice of Appearance in order to receive electronic notification of future activity in the case: Adam D. Franks. (hnc) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address by Raymond Lee Niblock.. (Niblock, Raymond) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Averitt Express, Inc.. (Fairley, J.) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form (tmc) |
| Filing 3 STATE COURT AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Averitt Express, Inc., John James, filed by Joshua Garcia.(tmc) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Sebastian County Circuit Court, case number 66FCV-24-32, filed by Averitt Express, Inc., John James. (Attachments: #1 State Court Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(tmc) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Averitt Express, Inc., John James. (tmc) |
| Notice of Removal filing fee paid re #2 Notice of Removal : $ 405, receipt number AARWDC-2910887.. (Fairley, J.) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING FILING FEE. The following document was received and filed without the appropriate filing fee: #2 Notice of Removal. You MUST pay the filing fee of $ 405.00 or file a motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis, if appropriate, within 2 business days.If the proper fees or motion are not received for case initiating documents, your case may be subject to dismissal.Present your payment to the appropriate Divisional Office or Pay Online, using the Civil -> Other Documents -> Filing Fee Submitted event. Filing Fee due by 1/22/2024 (tmc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
