Elder v. Shook et al
Christopher Bennett Elder |
Captain Jacob Shook, Sergeant Justice Cato, Sergeant John Griffith, Correctional Officer Fisher and Officer Marcus |
2:2024cv02013 |
January 24, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
Mark E Ford |
Susan O Hickey |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER adopting #6 Report and Recommendations in toto. Upon review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in toto. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff is warned that, in the future, this dismissal may be counted as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The Clerk is directed to place a 1915(g) strike flag on this case for future judicial consideration. Further, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g)(3), that any appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on March 19, 2024. (jlm) |
Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable marked No Longer Here. Mail originally sent to Christopher Bennett Elder at Johnson County Jail including #1 Complaint Referred (42:1983), #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, #3 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, #4 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form, and #5 Clerk's Order PLRA Initial Fee. No new address available. New Address due by 3/27/2024. (tmc) |
Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint Referred (42:1983) filed by Christopher Bennett Elder. Objections to R&R due by 3/14/2024. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on February 26, 2024. (tmc) |
Filing 5 CLERK'S ORDER re PLRA Initial Fee directing Johnson County Detention Center to collect from petitioner's prison account an initial partial filing fee of $38.67; thereafter to collect monthly payments from petitioner's prison account in amount equal to 20% of preceding month's income credited to account until $ 350.00 filing fee is paid in full (cc: Johnson County Detention Center). (tmc) |
Filing 4 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form (tmc) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983). Pursuant to the provisions of the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act, the Clerk is directed to collect the filing fee from the Plaintiff.Plaintiff is advised that he is required to immediately inform the Court of any change of address. If Plaintiff is transferred to another jail or prison or released, he shall have 30 days from the date of transfer or release in which to notify the Court of the new address. Plaintiff shall submit a change of address on a separate piece of paper entitled Notice to the Court of Change of Address and not include any motions or otherwise request relief in this document. The notice shall contain only information pertaining to the address change. The case will be subject to dismissal if Plaintiff fails to inform the Court of an address change. The Clerk is directed to collect the filing fee in the amount of $ 350.00. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on January 24, 2024. (tmc) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983) by Christopher Bennett Elder. Motions referred to Mark E. Ford.(tmc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT REFERRED (42:1983) against Justice Cato, Fisher, John Griffith, Marcus, and Jacob Shook, filed by Christopher Bennett Elder.(tmc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.