Smallen v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
| Gina L. Smallen |
| Social Security Administration Commissioner |
| 2:2024cv02025 |
| February 23, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Mark E Ford |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 TEXT ONLY SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER. Plaintiff must file a brief within (30) days of the date the transcript is filed. Plaintiff's failure to file a timely brief may result in dismissal for failure to prosecute. All briefs are limited to twenty (20) pages in length and must identify the specific points for appeal with references to the medical evidence supporting each point, transcript page numbers for all medical evidence referenced, and citations to case-law supporting the parties' positions. The briefs must also include the transcript page numbers of any duplicative and/or irrelevant medical records. Any brief found to be in noncompliance with these briefing rules may be stricken from the record. The Commissioner must file a brief within thirty (30) days of the date Plaintiff's brief is served, responding to the issues raised in the Plaintiff's brief. Additional relevant issues may also be raised, in accordance with the above briefing specifications and limitations.A reply brief may be filed within fourteen (14) days after the response brief is filed and shall be limited to those issues raised in the response brief that were not previously addressed.All Social Security Appeal cases will be scheduled for oral argument once the briefs have been filed. A scheduling notice will be issued and the case placed on the calendar for oral argument as soon as can reasonably be permitted under Court policies, but not earlier than sixty (60) days following the filing of the appeal brief by the Social Security Commissioner. The scheduling order will indicate the date, time, and location of the oral argument. Requests for continuance of oral argument, appearance via video conferencing or telephonic means, and waiver of oral argument must be made by formal motion as soon as possible following entry of the entry of the scheduling order. Said motions will be considered on a case-by-case basis, unless otherwise directed in the scheduling order. Plaintiffs SSA Appeal Brief due by 5/20/2024. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on April 19, 2024. (cla) |
| Filing 7 SOCIAL SECURITY TRANSCRIPT by Social Security Administration Commissioner. (Taylor, Candace) |
| Filing 6 TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis as after review it is found that Plaintiff is unable to pay for the costs of commencement of this suit and DIRECTING SERVICE on the Social Security Administration Commissioner and the US Attorney for the Western District/Arkansas via notice of electronic filing without prepayment of fees and costs. The Clerk of Court is directed to note the date of service on the docket sheet. Further, the Defendant is to answer within 60 days from the date of service. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on February 28, 2024. (cla) |
| Social Security Administration Commissioner served on 2/26/2024, answer due 4/26/2024. (tmc) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT TO ASSIGNMENT to U.S. Magistrate Judge by Gina L. Smallen. Government consent acknowledged pursuant to Standing Consent Letter. (Ray, Blake) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Gina L. Smallen. (Ray, Blake) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF DIRECT ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE. This case has been assigned to a U.S. Magistrate Judge to conduct all proceedings and for entry of a final judgment. You must file the attached form memorializing consent or requesting reassignment to a District Judge within fourteen (14) days. Consent or Reassignment form due by 3/11/2024. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form)(tmc) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration Commissioner, filed by Gina L. Smallen.(Ray, Blake) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Gina L. Smallen. Please proceed with filing your case initiating document(s).If the case initiating documents are not filed by Close of Business the next business day, this file may be closed.A civil action is commenced by filing a complaint with the Court (Fed.R.Civ.P.3). (tmc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smallen v. Social Security Administration Commissioner | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gina L. Smallen | |
| Represented By: | Blake Anthony Ray, Jr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Social Security Administration Commissioner | |
| Represented By: | USAARW Social Security |
| Represented By: | Candace L. Taylor |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
