Douglass v. Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc.
Nancy Douglass |
Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc. |
3:2008cv03050 |
September 4, 2008 |
US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
P.I.: Other Office |
Arkansas |
Jimm Larry Hendren |
Both |
Diversity |
28:1441 Petition for Removal |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 ORDER, that the case be, and it is hereby, dismissed with prejudice subject to the terms of the settlement agreement. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on November 6, 2009. (lw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Douglass v. Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Nancy Douglass | |
Represented By: | Johnny L. Nichols |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Richard D. Underwood |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.